I remember auditions working as such...An audition was
posted "Seeking female dancers between (5'2"-5'5") or
(5'5"-5'8")". Now I never fell in between those two height
ranges so I would go to the audition and they would either look over my height
and judge me based on my dancing, or tell me "You are a beautiful dancer
but you are too tall and we can not hire you". The problem that I have
encountered lately is that with the easy accessibility of the internet,
directors are asking to review your resume before the audition. This, of
course, cuts down on unqualified people auditioning, which is greatly
convenient for directors, but not for someone like me.
I recently sent in my resume to a director upon his request
for a winter contract. He sent me an email back saying, "Thank you
for your interest, but you do not meet the companies current height
criteria." I, of course, could fudge on my resume and say that I am 5'9",which is typically as tall as a dancer can be, but the second I walk into a room the fact that my height is
so extreme makes it obvious that I am NOT 5'9".
So do I lie to get my foot in the door and start off with an
obvious depiction, or tell the truth and run the risk of not being seen?
I am afraid that I don't have a good answer to this problem.
It is a directors prerogative to screen dancers before an audition if they so
choose. However, judging dancers solely on their "stats" is not a
trend I personally can get behind. My husband claims professional athletes say they are taller than they are all the time. It's just part of the game. So why can't a ballerina do the same? Finding a dance job is hard enough but of course it is kind of
impossible if you are not even able to audition.